The Climate Change Dictionary: What Is Carbon Colonialism? - The Quint - Dictionary

The Climate Change Dictionary’ is all about the buzzwords in the global politics of climate change, and carbon colonialism is making all the waves recently.

However, this explainer begins with a story of George and Govardhan.
George lives in the US and Govardhan lives in India.

For context: George’s per capita emissions are already far higher than they should be. He has a good life, access to luxuries and can also afford a vacation or two every year.

While Govardhan’s emissions are super low. He doesn’t have a regular electricity supply in the house, no air-conditioning, no hot water in the shower or actually no water, no shower and no pipelines.

So now George one day flies down to Govardhan’s small little hut near his farm in a small village and tries to cut a deal.

George says, "buddy, listen, we are both woke, we know all about global warming, we’ve got to save the planet and we must cut down on our carbon emissions as much as we can."

Govardhan nods.

George asks him to assume carbon to be a coin of gold that all humans on the planet have. All humans are allowed ten coins of gold. Each coin allows a certain level of carbon emission.

George has spent tens of these coins in his life so far, before these limits or conversations around it came into being, while Govardhan only maybe six.

George tells Govardhan that now he wants to buy a private jet and since both care about the planet, he has figured a way to save the planet and still buy his private jet.

He tells Govardhan to give him eight of his coins. If Govardhan gives these coins, George will have his private jet. But, Govardhan will also have to say goodbye to that hot shower for life.

While Govardhan’s emissions might be low right now, he needs to retain his supposed quota for carbon emissions or ‘carbon space’ to ensure development in the future.

His per capita emissions should go up because Govradhan deserves that hot-water shower in his life.

Join the dots… George is the greedy, gaslighting developed world and Govardhan is the developing world.

At the recently concluded COP 26 in Glasgow, the UN Climate Change Conference– the spokesperson of LMDC, a group of Like-Minded Developing Countries said that the principle of CBDR or Common But Differentiated Responsibility towards climate change can not change into common and ‘shared’ responsibility.

Differentiating between the capabilities and responsibilities of Govardhan and George is a must because when that is not done, Govardhan gets left behind, trampled on, exploited by a – sure, well-intended, but certainly super selfish and greedy– George.

And this is carbon colonialism and it manifests in different ways like pushing developing countries to announce immediate net-zero targets or lopsided conversations about achieving the 1.5-degree global temperature target while entirely ignoring the development needs of a large part of the world.

Shifting the burden of responsibility towards developing countries simply goes against climate justice.

Adblock test (Why?)

China welcomes Chinese translation of ‘Capitalism on a Ventilator’ - Workers World - Translation

We have very exciting news! The Chinese translation of “Capitalism on a Ventilator — The Impact of COVID-19 in China & the U.S.” — originally published in 2020 by World View Forum as a joint project of the International Action Center and China-U.S. Solidarity Network — is out and being discussed in China. 

Contemporary China Publishers, the publisher of the Chinese translation, has planned a big rollout. We’ve received word that, based on high recommendations, hundreds of bookstores and online sellers are interested in carrying the Chinese translation of the book.

“Capitalism on a Ventilator” was co-edited by Sara Flounders, Workers World contributing editor and co-coordinator of the International Action Center, and Lee Siu Hin, director of the China-U.S. Solidarity Network, who has been involved in the Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance. 

The anthology contrasts the effective Chinese response to COVID-19 with the disastrous response here in the U.S. and pushes back against the racist anti-China campaign in the media. The book was a tremendous challenge, involving months of effort to gather the contents of the anthology and then to find printers, online publishers and distributors for the book, which was censored by Amazon.

Workers World writers, who followed the impact of COVID-19 from its beginning in the U.S., drew comparisons to China’s handling of the pandemic and raised demands and concrete struggles as the virus spread; their articles are quite prominent in the book. Other chapters are by well-recognized left and anti-imperialist voices: Mumia Abu-Jamal, Lee Siu Hin, Margaret Kimberley, Vijay Prashad, Ngo Thanh Nhan, Ajamu Baraka, Max Blumenthal, Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers. 

Many of the chapters were first posted on workers.org and IACenter.org.

According to Wang Weiguang, Standing Committee Member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference National Committee, Director of the Ethnic and Religious Affairs Commission, Former President and former Party Secretary of Academic Department, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences: “The book, written by dozens of scholars from the United States and other countries, describes with realistic strokes the ‘grief’ and ‘pain’ of the American people under the impact of the new coronial pneumonia. It deeply analyzes and criticizes the capitalist system’s ability and efficiency to deal with sudden public health [crises] and exposes the most hypocritical, reactionary and backward side of the most developed capitalist countries in the world.”

Jiang Hui, Vice President of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Member of Party Group, Director of Contemporary China Research Institute, Dean of Marxist Studies states: “In the strong contrast between China and the United States in the fight against SARS, the book uncovers the hypocritical side of the world’s most developed capitalist countries, sounds the ‘alarm bell’ of the ineffectiveness of capitalist governance and enlightens the public to explore a new way of thinking.” 

Co-editor Flounders adds to these evaluations: “We could not have imagined how disastrous the virus impact would be in the U.S. and in other developed capitalist countries. As Marxists we did know that in a country totally dominated by a handful of billionaires, their interests in profiting from testing, vaccines, production of personal protective equipment and from the theft of our labor would overwhelm people’s need for free health care for all. Then the deaths tripled after the book came into print. 

“To see the enthusiasm in China for this book is encouraging. China followed a scientific, people-oriented approach that prioritized the health and safety of the whole population. This gives us, as Marxists, a real-time comparison in the difference socialism makes in handling a new phenomenon.”

Adblock test (Why?)

Lost in Translation - Commonweal - Translation

The alternative to such “ideological colonization,” Francis insisted, is on the one hand “reality therapy”—clear acknowledgement of the facts as they stand—and on the other, true dialogue concerning remedies to be taken. Pope Francis’s original Italian is suggestive: all countries, and especially poorer ones, need to be granted a “voce in capitolo,” literally a “voice in the chapter.” The English translation (“to have a say”) misses the key metaphor of the pope’s views on genuine diplomacy. In the Benedictine tradition, members of the community all have the opportunity to express their views in the chapter room; instead of “politics as usual,” a clash in which might makes right, there is long deliberation followed by discernment. In any decision taken, the good of each individual member goes hand in hand with the good of the whole community. 

Francis’s hope, articulated at the end of his speech, is that deliberation and dialogue among nations, once practiced, can become “contagious” and spread throughout the world. At this point, though, it seems like wishful thinking. Even in the sphere where Francis can exert control—that is, the inner workings of the Church—he has failed to convince many of his brother bishops, especially in the United States, to take up his project of synodality. It is tempting to suggest the pope and his advisors could benefit from a dose of reality themselves. On the other hand, we shouldn’t let the loose interpretation of “cancel culture” obscure Francis’s bigger point: our interconnected crises of global poverty, war, migration, and climate devastation aren’t just problems rich countries should work to alleviate, but outcomes for which they bear direct responsibility.  

Adblock test (Why?)

The Hilarious Translation Mistake KFC China Made With Its Slogan - Mashed - Translation

We know and love KFC for its crispy fried chicken, mashed potatoes and gravy, and fluffy biscuits. You hear the phrase "it's finger-lickin' good," and you immediately think of the food chain, and for a good reason. Before it pressed pause in 2020 on using the famous slogan in ad campaigns, it had been in use for an impressive 64 years, according to the chain.

However, this isn't the first time KFC's slogan made people scratch their heads. According to Business Insider, KFC made a bit of a translation boo-boo when it first opened in China in the 1980s. "Finger-lickin' good" was somehow translated to "eat your fingers off." Far from appetizing, right?

Fortunately for this fried chicken chain, the mistake didn't scare off too many customers. By 2011, KFC made up about 40% of the fast food industry in China, per the Harvard Business Review. 

Adblock test (Why?)

Translation: Backlash Over Official’s Warning Against New Year “Malicious Homecomings” - China Digital Times - Translation

As the Chinese New Year holiday approaches, social media is buzzing with “malicious” comments about “malicious” activities like “malicious homecomings.” This miasma of malice materialized on January 20 thanks to a viral video clip of Dong Hong, county magistrate of Dancheng county in Henan province, warning that residents returning to his county from medium and high COVID risk areas would be subject to quarantine followed by immediate arrest, even if they could show a vaccination certificate or proof of a negative nucleic-acid COVID test taken within the previous 48 hours. 

Responding to public outrage over his words, Dong Hong attempted to calm the situation by claiming that important context had been edited out of the clip (maliciously, perhaps)—he had actually said that people who “refuse to be dissuaded and maliciously return to their hometowns” would be quarantined and then detained. His clarification only provoked further public outcry, as netizens began riffing on the phrase “malicious homecoming” and expanding it to include other so-called “malicious” activities. 

CDT Chinese has collected some netizen comments about the controversy, translated here:

封华绝佳Alex：I go home for New Year and they fucking call it a “malicious homecoming.”

无敌小娘子-biubiubiu：Malicious petition, malicious conjecture, malicious rumor, malicious speech, malicious breathing, malicious living.

头秃_____________：After maliciously demanding our unpaid wages, we maliciously return to our hometowns.

华隆所-经天85588：How can it be considered a “malicious homecoming” if you have a vaccination certificate and proof of a negative nucleic-acid test within the last 48 hours? If you can’t be dissuaded from coming home, you’ll be detained? What law allows that? And now the county magistrate is self-righteously claiming that they edited out the part where he said, “refuse to be dissuaded and maliciously return to their hometowns?” 

爽爽面TCBY：I’m maliciously commenting.

叶荣添alsdrnst：Someday we’ll defeat COVID, but I’m afraid we’ll never rid ourselves of the “bureaucratic virus.”

多云转晴2010：The pandemic has made the incompetence of some local officials crystal clear, hahaha.

B面的菠萝：What, now going home is being classed as either “malicious” or “well-intentioned”? ? ?

云和山的彼端23：What kind of country doesn’t let folks return to their hometowns? [Chinese]

The following day, print and television state media chimed in: editorials in the People’s Daily, China Daily, and on CCTV criticized Dong Hong and other local officials for taking pandemic controls to extremes, and reiterated the importance of allowing people to return to their hometowns to celebrate Chinese New Year. Yet there was scant mention in state media of the competing pressures that drive local governments to such extremes, such as punishment of some local officials for allowing COVID outbreaks to spiral out of control. Phoebe Zhang of the South China Morning Post detailed some of the state media responses:

On Sunday, a social media post by state news agency Xinhua said trips to hometowns were justified and in no way malicious.

State broadcaster CCTV said in a commentary on Friday that such incidents showed that local governments were afraid of making a mistake and taking responsibility for it, causing them to follow one-size-fits-all policies.

“What does ‘maliciously return home’ even mean?” it said. “What’s the standard, who makes the call and what’s the legal basis for quarantine and detention?”

[…] China has punished officials in various cities for mismanagement during the pandemic. Last month, 26 officials from Xian were disciplined for a lax response and mismanagement of a quarantine hotel blamed for a Covid-19 outbreak that prompted a lockdown of the city’s 13 million residents. [Source]

This was not the only recent case of a locality trying to dissuade its residents from returning. On January 15, a town in Shaanxi province announced an incentive system for villages within the township that manage to dissuade residents from returning—the top three villages would each receive 1000 yuan, and the bottom three villages would each be fined 1000 yuan:

A notice urging residents of Yankou township in Xixiang county, Shaanxi province, not to return to their hometown for Chinese New Year is attracting attention. The notice, issued on January 15, 2022, states that township and village cadres, local police officers and public security, and the village Communist Party secretary should first call residents living outside of the area and attempt to dissuade them from returning. Those who insist on returning home will receive follow-up calls from the mayor and the township Communist Party committee secretary. The notice also introduced a ranked incentive system for this “dissuasion work” in each village and local community. The government of Yankou township confirmed that the notice was genuine, and said that it was intended to lighten the load of local epidemic prevention and quarantine work.

The following netizen comments have been collected from the internet by CDT Chinese editors:

哇哈哈1000-767：This is just adding more layers of people you have to report to, wherever you go.

五十六個民族壹家亲：The country lets you go back home. The province asks you to think it over before you come home. The city asks you to seriously consider whether it is necessary to come home. The county tells you straight up not to come home. The village says, “GTFO.”

闻控87514： This is lazy governance, imposing a “one-size-fits-all” policy.

nomonstersinthesea: Whoever came up with this policy isn’t lazy, they’re just plain bad. [Chinese]

In a now-deleted article that has been archived by CDT Chinese, WeChat user @一丘万壑 discussed the double standards that allow officials to classify certain actions as “malicious,” summing it up thus:

We say our intentions are good, but say others have “malicious” intentions. Our mistakes are unintentional, but the mistakes of others are intentional. This malleable use of “intent” is ideological in nature. [Chinese]

Xu Lin, a writer associated with the Independent Chinese PEN Center, captured the zeitgeist of “malicious homecoming” in a poem republished by CDT Chinese and translated below:

Malice

As New Year approaches

I’ve returned to my hometown, with malice

Are you still in some distant city

Maliciously demanding your unpaid wages?

Some folks file malicious lawsuits

Others, malicious petitions

Some foreign-owned factories offer

Maliciously extravagant severance pay

Some slackers maliciously lie flat

Some couples maliciously refuse to have children

The internet is full of malicious questions

Malicious exposés

Malicious retweets

Malicious comments

Malicious likes

The world is full of malice

Even the wind blows with ill intent

Of course, there are also a lot of good intentions:

Deleting posts is well-intentioned

Blocking accounts is well-intentioned

Quarantine and detention are well-intentioned

As are fines and inflation

Even a good beating

Comes with the best of intentions

In sum:

If they say it’s malicious, it is

If they say it’s well-intentioned, it is

I don’t want to die of malice

And I don’t want to live on good intentions

But I have no choice—

Though I might be better off dead,

I will continue to live out of spite.

— Xu Lin

January 20, 2022 [Chinese]

Adblock test (Why?)

New English translation of classic Chinese children's book published - Xinhua - Translation

LONDON, Jan. 25 (Xinhua) -- A new English translation of a modern classic Chinese book for children, "I Want To Be Good" by Huang Beijia, a well-known author in China, has been published this month by UK-based New Classic Press.

The book, which was translated by Nicky Harman, a UK-based prize-winning literary translator, had been picked as a "Top Children's Book in Translation" by the International Committee of the Children's Literature Association, Alicia Liu, an advisor to the Nanjing-based publisher, Phoenix Juvenile and Children's publishing Ltd, in Jiangsu province, China, told Xinhua on Tuesday.

"I Want To Be Good" became an instant classic when it was first published in 1996 by the Chinese publisher and has sold over 5 million copies in China. It has also been adapted for the cinema, television and stage, and translated into nine languages including English, French, German, Russian, Korean, Vietnamese and Arabic.

The book tells the story of a ten-year-old girl who is under constant pressure to do better and pass important school exams.

The author said the story was inspired by her personal life, specifically "the complicated relationship between mother and daughter," and challenging "the traditional thought of being a Tiger Mother in the competitive learning environment in China."

According to the Chinese publisher, the book has been much loved in China as it has encouraged a generation of young readers to be ambitious, resilient, and most importantly to be themselves.

Nicky Harman said: "It's a book with a lot of heart and I thoroughly recommend it." Enitem

Adblock test (Why?)

Opinion: Why we need to remove 'waste' from the dictionary - CSO Magazine - The Global CSR & Sustainability Platform - Dictionary

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Opinion: Why we need to remove 'waste' from the dictionary  CSO Magazine - The Global CSR & Sustainability Platform