Monday, April 17, 2023

Lost in Translation: The Real Meaning of the Expression ‘Suck My Tongue’ That Tarnished Image of the Dalai Lama - American Kahani - Translation

Now that the global consternation over the Dalai Lama’s “suck my tongue” controversy has blown over to make room for other outrages, it may be a good time to examine if something was lost in translation in the Buddhist spiritual leader’s encounter with a young boy.

First, what exactly had happened — in an edited video clip that went viral last weekend (the actual event took place on Feb. 28), a boy is seen asking the Dalai Lama for a hug, following which the leader blesses him, and asks him to kiss him and sticks out his tongue saying, “suck my tongue.”

The “scandalous” video and the outrage spread like a forest fire. Some clips recorded 5 million views. Angry responses followed — “scandalous,” “disgusting,” “abusive,” and “sick old man.”

Even though the seemingly bizarre encounter took place in front of hundreds of devotees at a temple in Dharamshala, no one seems to have paused to wonder why the Dalai Lama would kiss a child on the lips and say such an outrageous thing. Even a seasoned pervert wouldn’t be so brazen.

Social media lit up with accusations fast and loose. A Twitter user declared, “The Dalai Lama is a pedophile. The child was assaulted. No sane person is okay with what he did to that child and the worst part is this happens to so many kids cuz y’all normalize predatory behavior in close family members.”

Rapper Cardi B chimed in saying, “This world is full of predators. They prey on the innocent. The ones who are most unknowing, our children. Predators could be our neighbors, our school teachers, even people with money, power & our churches. Constantly talk with your kids about boundaries and what they shouldn’t allow people to do to them.”

The 87-year-old Buddhist priest quickly became a butt of the joke in the late-night shows. From Bill Maher and Steven Colbert to Chelsea Handler, every comedian was on to it.

“It is absolutely ridiculous that people are jumping all over this expression, because of what it would mean if a man here, in the West, would utter it. Sometimes languages translate in weird ways.”

Even an apology from the Dalai Lama’s representative saying, “His Holiness often teases people he meets in an innocent and playful way, even in public and before cameras. He regrets the incident,” only added fuel to fire. A Newsweek columnist wrote that the apology, “seemed odd at best, abusive at worst.”

“While it’s great that His Holiness ‘regrets’ asking a child to ‘suck my tongue,’ this ‘apology’ is not only insufficient and offensive but feels more like the Dalai Lama is gaslighting rather than apologizing,” the columnist added.

Journalist Raneem Bou Khzam tweeted, “Teasing??? This has nothing to do with teasing!!! This is a highly questionable behavior jeopardizing the little boy’s mental health, and it falls under the abuse of childhood innocence!”

a South African geologist responded, “Why did you even have such a filthy and revolting thought? You are truly disgusting. You are a menace to children.”

See Also

What is obvious in the visceral reactions, particularly in the West, is both the ignorance of cultural differences and a reluctance to give the benefit of the doubt to alien traditions. Perhaps, that is why the responses of Western Buddhist devotees who have followed and known the Dalai Lama for a long time were more reasoned.

When asked about how she saw the controversy, an American Buddhist in Oakland, California, who visited Dharamshala many a time, explained to American Kahani in these terms: “I have no idea what the Dalai Lama meant when he said that, since I was not there and am not familiar with any of the context. I think though, that it is absolutely ridiculous that people are jumping all over this expression, because of what it would mean if a man here, in the West, would utter it. Sometimes languages translate in weird ways … The Dalai Lama is an old man, one with probably the highest levels of integrity a human being can achieve on this planet. Give him the benefit of the doubt.”

She attributed the misunderstanding to “our hyper-sensitized culture.”
“Awkward? Yes,” she concluded.

The most illuminating explanation for the controversy came from the Vice report which cited a second-generation Tibetan refugee, Jiggle Ugen’s YouTube video, in which he explains how such a display of affection was born out of a game played between elderly Tibetans and children.

The report quotes Ugen as saying, “Kids who go up to their grandfather, for instance, are asked to kiss their grandfather’s forehead, touch their noses and kiss them. Then [the grandfather] says that I’ve given you everything so the only thing left is for you to eat my tongue … The child probably never gets the candy or money but gets a beautiful lesson about life, love and family.”

Vice also cites a Tibetan feminist educator in India, who says “suck my tongue” in Tibetan is also a game for the elders to deter cheeky kids from pestering them. “The word ‘suck’ in the Tibetan language is ‘jhip’, and this is not a word that is sexualized in our culture,” she says.

Adblock test (Why?)

Here Is the Lyric Translation to Bad Bunny & Grupo Frontera’s ‘un x100to’ - Billboard - Translation

When two ‘perfect worlds’ join forces, a new heartbreak anthem gets delivered. On Monday (April 17), Grupo Frontera and Bad Bunny officially dropped “un x100to” (one percent) after Benito showed off his cumbia-dancing skills on his TikTok account before a surprise announcement posted on Sunday (April 16) afternoon.

Explore

See latest videos, charts and news

See latest videos, charts and news

Produced and composed by Latin hitmaker Edgar Barrer, the romantic cumbia-norteño — backed by the captivating percussion and an accordion melody, and Grupo Frontera’s signature tunes — narrates the story of a person who misses their ex and makes a phone call with one percent of battery left on their phone.

Below, read the full lyrics translated into English.

I have 1% left
And I’ll use it to tell you how sorry I am.
That if they see me with another at a club, I’m just wasting time
Baby, why am I lying to you?
That they saw me happy is not true

nothing makes me laugh anymore
Only when I see the photos and videos I have of you
I went out with another to forget you, and she had the perfume that you like
I light it up to go to sleep
Because I sleep better if I dream that you are here
If you knew that I wrote to you
I have not sent the messages, they are all still there
Wow, how much it has cost me
Maybe I did you a favor when I left your side
Drunk looking at your photos. It hurts to see that you have improved
You don’t have gray days, and the scars no longer hurt
And I am thinking whether to tell you that

I have 1% left
And I’ll use it to tell you how sorry I am.
That if they see me with another at a club, I’m just wasting time
Baby, why am I lying to you?
That they saw me happy is not true, (hey)

I haven’t thought about you in a long time
Drunk, your Insta I checked
Baby, I already know that you are doing well
That you don’t have to know about me, hey, hey
Living in a hell that I set on fire myself
Playing with you as if it were the ten
I feel that I am no longer in your heart, now I am at your feet’
Begging you, drowning in tequila
The boys’ are asking me out
I have a good time, but I always end up missing you
Drowning in tequila, hey
‘Las morritas’ texting me, hey
Where is the peda today, but

I have 1% left
And I’ll use it to tell you how sorry I am.
That if they see me with another at a club, I’m just wasting time
Baby, why am I lying to you?
That they saw me happy is not true, (hey)

And this is Grupo Frontera
And the ‘compa’ Bad Bunny

Adblock test (Why?)

How To Read the Dictionary in Bitlife - The Nerd Stash - Dictionary

Want to know how to read the dictionary in BitLife? You need to read the dictionary to earn the Human Dictionary achievement or complete the Lucrative Lexicon challenge in BitLife. After completing these tasks, you can earn special rewards or become a famous author. The dictionary you need to read is The Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 3000 pages to be exact.

We’ll walk you through how to read the dictionary in BitLife and the fastest way to complete the challenge.

How to Read the Dictionary in BitLife?

You must unluck reading before reading the dictionary. You can unlock reading under Activities > Mind & Body > Book. As your character gets older, you’ll have access to more adult books, and eventually, you’ll be able to read the dictionary in BitLife. To become a librarian or writer in BitLife, you may need to read many books. Besides, reading books can increase your Genius level, which will help you find many excellent careers in BitLife.

bitlife how to read the dictionary

Once the dictionary is accessible in your character’s selections, you will see “The Merriam-Webster Dictionary” in your list. You can start reading by clicking on the dictionary. This dictionary is 3000 pages long, and you need to tap through all the pages until it’s done. You have to spend a lot of time here for this, which can get frustrating after a point. That’s why reading the dictionary in BitLife requires a lot of patience.

Related:

BitLife: How to Become a Famous Author

How to Read the Dictionary Fast in BitLife?

If reading a 3,000-page dictionary sounds like torture, you’re right. You have a few more alternatives to avoid dealing with this. When you click to read a book, you will see three more options besides reading: abandon it, pick a different book, or watch the movie instead. If you choose to watch the movie, an unskippable ad pops up, and after you finish watching the ad, it’s considered as if you’ve read the whole book in BitLife. This way, you complete challenges like the Human Dictionary or the Lucrative Lexicon in BitLife.

BitLife is now available on Android and iOS.

Adblock test (Why?)

Sunday, April 16, 2023

Chinese investors call for mandatory translation of property rules, as fallout at one of Australia's largest apartment buildings continues - ABC News - Translation

阅读中文版

Shanghai resident Louis Yu is proud of his four investment properties in Melbourne and found them easy to manage from China — until one of his apartments became a "headache".

That apartment is part of Aurora Melbourne Central, one of the tallest residential buildings in Melbourne with more than 1,000 dwellings.

"We thought [Australian real estate] was a mature market and it was supposed to be well regulated," Mr Yu said.

Mr Yu was approached, on the Chinese messaging app WeChat, by a woman asking him for his Aurora apartment "vote". 

Mr Yu said Hung-Jing Tiong, known to residents as Jing, provided a form in English which he signed without fully understanding what it said or meant.

His experience is one of several similar stories other overseas investors — with apartments in the same building — have told the ABC. 

Loading...

Some apartment owners appeared to be unaware of the implications of signing a proxy vote form, and the power they were handing to Ms Tiong, who allegedly managed to collect more than 350 proxy votes.

After securing those votes, Ms Tiong became chairperson of multiple owners corporations at Aurora.

Since then, a litany of disputes have erupted at the building, with complaints to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), Consumer Affairs Victoria and police.

Two separate companies have also begun legal action against Aurora owners corporations in the Victorian Supreme Court.

In one case, facility management services company FFM International (FFMI) alleges the owners corporations "failed or refused to pay invoices to FFMI" totalling more than $2.4 million, court documents show.

Hung-Jing Tiong is an apartment owner at Aurora Melbourne Central.()

Owners corporations under Ms Tiong's leadership are also accused of overseeing a host of other controversial rules, like banning food deliveries and large parcels from being left in the foyer, and switching off fob keys. 

In March, Ms Tiong was filmed allegedly biting a worker during an altercation.

A complaint was made to police who investigated the incident but said no charges would be laid.

Ms Tiong denies all of the above allegations.

She said she only holds 5 per cent of owners proxy votes and most people "are happy with Aurora as everything [has] improved".

Mr Yu said issues at the building could have been prevented if overseas owners had access to information about the strata scheme in Chinese, or languages other than English, so they understood the importance of proxy voting rules.

"I believe most of us never thought [we would] get into such a complicated situation," he said.

Proxy vote farming a 'common issue'

Samantha Reece says property rules should be translated into languages other than English.()

Australian Apartment Advocacy director Samantha Reece said proxy farming by either lot owners or strata managers was a "common" issue her organisation dealt with.

Of the 527 requests for mediation that her organisation received last year, Ms Reece said a quarter of them were cases involving overseas buyers.

She said the language barrier was at the heart of the issue, with limited resources regarding Australian property regulations being available in languages other than English.

"English as a second language is often hard for them [overseas buyers] to understand," she said.

"Some strata managers do actually produce their agendas in Chinese, but not many."

To better inform overseas buyers, Ms Reese has encouraged strata managers who are responsible for the administration of owners corporations to provide fact sheets about the property in the languages of the buyers they are mainly dealing with.

"We should be providing that kind of education in a variety of different languages because we are a multicultural country," she said.

Lot owner says reforms did not control proxy vote allocation

Aurora Melbourne Central has multiple owners corporations.()

Chinese investors have told the ABC a website had been set up to collect voting proxies.

Some apartment owners were asked to log in to the website and fill out the owners corporation proxy form. 

WeChat screenshots sent to the ABC show some confusion among investors about the form and who they had assigned their vote to.

In a 2021 email to an Aurora owners group that was provided to the ABC, Ms Tiong wrote: "I am your proxy, I hold more than 40 per cent owners' proxy."

The email was signed: "Your proxy holder: Hung Jing Tiong."

Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV), the agency that oversees legal disputes related to strata matters in Victoria, explained that apartment owners can hand their votes to other apartment owners to represent them but there are restrictions.

"The Victorian government implemented significant reforms to the way owners corporations operate in December 2021," a CAV spokesperson said. 

"The reforms place limits on the amount of proxies that can be held by any one person, as well as ensuring committee members can give their proxy only to another committee member."

The apartment building is in a busy location in the heart of the city.()

However, one Aurora apartment owner, who didn't want to use her real name, said these legislative changes did little to control the issue.

She said Ms Tiong's proxy votes "were simply divided out to a small number of other individuals who voted in exactly the same way as Jing in subsequent general meetings".

"If you're an owner-resident, please be vigilant," she said.

Aurora Melbourne Central is so large that it has at least six owners corporations and is subject to a series of complicated regulations.

"An owners corporation is basically a club that you join when you own a property in a strata scheme," said Jimmy Thomson, an expert in strata laws and regulations who edits the Flat Chat website and hosts the related podcast.

A strata scheme refers to a building or group of buildings that have been divided into lots like apartments or townhouses and when you buy a lot, you also share ownership of the building's common property along with other owners.

The common property is managed by an owners corporation which makes decisions on how the building is run.

When you buy a lot, you are also automatically allocated a vote you can use in the owners corporation decision making processes.

Special general meeting ousts chair

Residents say their parcels were placed outside the Aurora Melbourne Central foyer.()

In February, a group of Aurora owners organised an unprecedented special general meeting for owners corporation one, which was attended by about 200 people and lasted more than four hours.

This group of owners also organised Mandarin interpreters for attendees who don't speak English.

The meeting passed several resolutions including one to remove the committee of owners corporation one, the largest owners corporation at Aurora which included Ms Tiong, and install a new committee.

In her response to the ABC, Ms Tiong disputed the outcome of that meeting and copied in a lawyer from Sinisgalli Foster, who reiterated her position.

Correspondence shared with the ABC said the firm is acting for the committee members who were "purportedly replaced" at the February meeting.

Ms Tiong remains chair of several smaller Aurora owners corporations, but the ABC understands further special general meetings are being planned.

Vanessa, an undergraduate student at RMIT who didn't want to use her full name, was one of the owners who voted to oust Ms Tiong.

She said it had been difficult to live in the building over recent months with policies she finds problematic.

"A lot of issues can't be solved," she said.

"I lost four parcels in half a year. They're not worth much but it's quite annoying.

"Our food deliveries were also being thrown out of the building."

'There's nothing you can do'

Aurora residents have told the ABC they have made reports to VCAT and Consumer Affairs Victoria about disputes in the building but the majority of issues remain unresolved.

There are five cases in VCAT related to Aurora. 

Mr Thomson said VCAT has the power to appoint a strata manager to replace an owners corporation committee.

But right now in Victoria the tribunal system is overwhelmed with cases that could take more than a year to be attended to.

"If you're in a building which is seriously dysfunctional, you're stuffed really, there's nothing you can do," Mr Thomson said.

VCAT declined to comment.

There are a number of cases related to Aurora before the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.()

The Victorian Strata Community Association (SCA) said the issues at Aurora showed there was a need for better policy intervention into the owners corporation sector by the state government.

SCA (Victoria) president Julie McLean said strata living was forecast to grow in popularity over coming decades.

"Measures can and must be taken now to protect consumer confidence in apartment living, give owners and managers the tools they need to work together in harmony, and ensure greater respect and understanding in strata communities," Ms McLean said.

The state government has been contacted for comment. 

The disputes at Aurora have also left some overseas investors like Mr Yu questioning if they should invest in Australia in future.  

"I'm not sure … how this would be resolved," Mr Yu said.

"For migrants and overseas buyers, this has had quite a negative impact [on confidence in the Australian real estate market]."

Read the story in Chinese: 阅读中文版

Adblock test (Why?)

Tamil New Year Special: An Interview With Scholar Who Translated 'Ponniyin Selvan' Into Sanskrit - Swarajya - Translation

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Tamil New Year Special: An Interview With Scholar Who Translated 'Ponniyin Selvan' Into Sanskrit  Swarajya

Commentary: Far from lost in translation, Macron said exactly what he meant on Taiwan - CNA - Translation

CAREFUL WORDS

Not only is Macron displaying continuity over a nearly six-year period, but his seems a reasonable point. Reflecting on the conversations that have been had recently in Australia about sovereign decision-making, why should we begrudge a country for wanting to contribute in its own way to the prevention of a major crisis in the Indo-Pacific?

Macron certainly expressed himself in a colourful and typically Francophone way - other than Scott Morrison’s brief dalliance with International Relations theory, you’d be hard-pressed to remember an Australian prime minister talking about events in international affairs “from a Gramscian perspective”. But the reaction to Marcon’s comments has also been typically - and disappointingly - Anglophone.

The French president’s statements are not some kind of Munich-lite appeasement speech, as former United Kingdom prime minister Liz Truss suggests. Nor can any one leader can speak for all members of the European Union. Macron’s comments were an expression of existing French policy.

The idea of a trading bloc the size of the European Union acting to balance against the potential aggression of a rising China should be greeted with interest and engagement. Unlike Australia, which until recently believed it could reasonably not make a choice between the United States and China, the EU’s economic heft make it far more able to do just this.

Macron’s government understands that a crisis in Asia would affect Europe. The French Indo-Pacific Strategy, unveiled by Macron at Sydney’s Garden Island in 2018, and updated in 2022, makes this point in its first pages. And the French military presence of more than 8,000 soldiers stationed in the Indo-Pacific, from Reunion to French Polynesia, is, of course, far higher a number than partners in London appear capable of providing.

Undoubtedly, world leaders should be careful about what they say, when, and how they say it. Yet as Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong has said, talking to China is good.

Asserting that a war over Taiwan is in no one’s interest is correct. Deterrence can be an effective way of preventing war, but major arms races between superpowers have rarely ended peacefully.

Recent Australian governments of both persuasions have talked about welcoming like-minded engagement in the region. After reading the commentary of the last few days, you have to wonder if that only means minds that think in English.

David Vallance is a Research Associate at the Lowy Institute. This commentary first appeared on Lowy Institute's blog The Interpreter.

Adblock test (Why?)

"Dig Where Your Stand", Swedish rallying cry for workers, translated into English for the first time - Boing Boing - Translation

I believe that learning comes from life and living. Life and living can lead to a classroom or workshop, a fascination with reading, movies, or documentaries, or the joy of listening to others' stories. Learning is living life with others, acting and thinking, creating and loving, lamenting, working, sleeping, being, and surviving.

To beleaguer the obvious point, a classroom is not necessary to learn and can, in fact, hinder learning. Or, as Naeem Inayatullah proposes, perhaps "teaching is impossible, and learning is unlikely" – in the classroom.

Popular education, learning from life, where everyone is a researcher, asking questions about how to make tomorrow different, asking questions about how today came about, asking questions about who created the conditions inherited when born, is the type of learning I appreciate and look for.

Exterminate All the Brutes, the four-part HBO-produced documentary by Raoul Peck, is based on Sven Lindqvist's book of the same name. Exterminate All the Brutes "is a searching examination of Europe's dark history in Africa and the origins of genocide." Yet, before Lindqvist's research was transformed into a incite-ful and insightful documentary, Lindqvist started the "Dig-movement."

Linqvist's first book, Dig Where You Stand: How to Research a Job, has been published in English for the first time forty-five years after its initial publication in 1978.

"Dig Where You Stand is a rallying cry for workers to become researchers, to follow the money, take on the role as experts on their job, and "dig" out its hidden histories in order to take a vital step towards social and economic transformation. A how-to guide that inspired an entire movement, it makes the case that everyone – not just academics – can learn how to critically and rigorously explore history, especially their own history, and in doing so, find a blueprint for how to transform society for the better. In a world where the balance of power is overwhelmingly stacked against the working-class, Dig Where You Stand's manifesto for the empowerment of workers through self-education, historical research and political solidarity is as important and relevant today as it was in 1978."

In the introduction to the English edition, Andrew Flinn and Astrid von Rosen explain, "The central idea underpinning Dig Where You Stand is that doing history work is a necessary and significant contributory factor in achieving social, political and industrial change, and indeed fashioning a new world…. It instructs the reader how to formulate and pose urgent and critical research questions – questions about power and the lived legacies of the past in the present still relevant today – and provides the researcher with the tools to research and answer those questions."

The book honors the power of history from below. It narrates an accessible and collective process that was part of a public education and research movementduring the late 1970s and 1980s in Sweden, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Intended to create counter-histories to elite capitalist narratives, "The Dig-movement" or Grävrörelsen also created study materials for producing local history. "The Dig-movement consisted of thousands of local study circles aimed at fostering local democracy, conducting local and industrial historical research, producing worker's theatre and lots of other aesthetic activities resulting in exhibitions, oral history sessions and writing workshops."

At a time when university education is under attack by right-wing ideologues; when dedicating four, five, sometimes six years to college often has the consequence of piled-on, trauma-inducing lifetime debt; and when workers organize unions in new labor sectors and across national borders, learning and researching should be democratic practice worth recovering.

By democratic, I do not mean voting or partisan ideas. Instead, the emphasis is on the root of radical democracy, the democratic living of collective participation in understanding and impacting the world through open-source TOR-inspired technology and research projects by emerging unionized workers, to abolitionist-inspired after-school skateboard programs, and everything and all in between. Democratic living is not having to make oneself available for authoritarianism and the censored historical narratives proffered by fascists – and their politicians – from Florida.

Lindqvist was a prolific writer and public intellectual. Many of his thirty-five manuscripts of essays, history, travel literature, aphorisms, and other presentations were translated into more than ten languages. Lindqvist prose transcended, melded, and split genres, while his handbook for research empowered working people to tell their own stories.

On the occasion of Lindvqist's death in 2019, The New Press released this excerpted statement, quoting writer Adam Hochschild, "Like many of the most original writers, Sven Lindqvist is hard to pigeonhole. He is not exactly a historian, for his graduate degree is in literature. He is not exactly a travel writer, for he has little interest in the colorful details that make a place seem exotic; he always wants to direct our attention back to our own culture. He is not exactly a journalist, for when he travels to far points on the globe, he is less likely to interview anyone than to tell us about his own dreams." Hochschild continues, "Lindqvist's work leaves you changed . . . [he] opens a world to us, a world with its comforting myths stripped away. You read him at your own risk."

Adblock test (Why?)